top of page


'As our three-day gathering drew to a close, I was asked by the facilitators, Judith and Maria, if I would consider giving the priests present, a statement of what my vision for the Diocese would be. They felt that the feedback and the work done in the previous two days had surfaced the desire on behalf of the priests for such a statement.

I began by outlining my concerns in relation to any vision statement. I stated my hope that any outlining of a vision would be something which would be flexible and oriented to allow future development. I expressed my concern at the outset that anything I would say would be something that empowers people and is not a vision that binds us into a certain direction, irrespective of what we would learn while on the journey.

I offer the following Mission statement to the priests and to the people and the parishes of the Diocese of Ferns.

“My vision is that the all the people of the Diocese of Ferns would have access to the transformative power of the Gospel, the hope that it brings and the seal on that hope through the Sacramental life of the Church”

While setting out this vision, I am very aware that as a Church we have been Sacramentalised but not Evangelised and the work of the future is to be evangelisers, to draw people into relationship with Christ and to move, in the words of Pope Francis, “from Maintenance to Mission”

I see my own role as Bishop as a servant to that vision, to go where it leads me and to devote my energy into making it a reality in each of the 49 parishes or 96 church communities which make up the Diocese.

I would outline two tasks which are of equal importance in our work in the years ahead.

- To build and sustain Christian Community at a local level and to maximise the involvement of local people in their local church.

- To support the priests who are ministering in the Diocese to have a meaningful and healthy ministry as the workload changes and to help them offload work that was appropriate and meaningful in the model we are moving out of but will be unstainable into the future.

The sustaining of each of our Christian Communities will entail the maximizing of the energy available in each community through training of lay people to take up roles of leadership in liturgy, administration and pastoral care and to continue to promote a church ethos which will encourage vocations to priesthood and religious life. In discussions which followed my presentation there was some discussion about where vocations will come from in the future and, while most priests now in ministry experience a positive culture of vocations in the home, this is no longer the reality for young people. The task then seems to be for us to find an alternative source of that culture and this I think will only come from

In relation to how we work and live as priests in the future, I offered the following initial proposals as to how our work might look like in the years ahead

· Groups of three to five priests working as a team to provide pastoral services across a pastoral area.

· The core work of the team would also be the work of the Diocese - to establish a new model of ministry while providing a sustainable ministry to the people and the parishes in the interim.

· Beginning to explore the idea that our primary mission is to preach the Gospel, not to sustain a structure we inherited (Maintenance to Mission)

· This will pose a number of challenges for all of us priests who were trained and ministered with the working assumption that there will be a substantial number of priests working in the Diocese in the future.

· As priests we have to prepare ourselves and the people of the Diocese for a ministry which is a mixture of lay and clerical.

· What do I think are the key elements of priests working together as a team

o Willingness to participate in the Mission – acknowledging that change is now inescapable.

o Willing to participate in a team meeting each week

o Willing to bring all significant decisions for discussion to the team meeting.

o Willing to make a period of prayer (eg Lectio Divina) part of the team meeting.

o Willingness to change our pattern of work so that new things can be tried – this includes stopping doing some things that were always done.

o Willingness to accept diversity of how others minister but not allowing

· What are the challenges that we need to address now?

o Changing our own culture about how we work is a slow process and needs to begin immediately. No one event will change something that is deeply rooted in us but consistent work will.

· The roadmap for the Diocese will have to be established in consultation with the people and parishes of the Diocese over the immediate years ahead BUT

· The roadmap for ourselves and how we adapt our ministry can begin with the work we did during our days away in Mount Wolseley.

The themes above are outlines of what might be possible but they will take a different shape in different parts of the Diocese, depending on the rural/urban reality or the reality of the different ages and skills of the priests available. But what is certain, is that we need to begin the journey from Lone Ranger to Team Player, not just because it is in a vision statement but because it is to only way that our health and wellbeing at a physical and vocational level will be sustained.

I proposed to the gathering that our care for priests should also take in two elements.

The care for older priests living in the community by setting up a part time nursing post, similar to what is happening in other Dioceses and the signing up to a trauma support system for priests when they are involved in traumatic situations such as accidents or suicides. At the moment, the only attendee at a trauma scene who does not receive subsequent trauma support is the priest.

I also outlined my intentions to hold a series of meetings throughout October, with the Principals and current Chairs of Boards of our Primary schools with the intention of transitioning from Priest Chairs to Lay chairs when the next change of Boards happens in November 2023.

As priests get fewer in number in the Diocese and as the workload changes, it will also be necessary to look at how priests are paid and, as parishes in an area are served by a team of priests, to ensure that there is equity in how priests are funded.

One of the concerns that was raised throughout the three days was the necessity of support for priests and parishes in a time of transition and I think this concern has to be taken very seriously. If we had unlimited resources it would be possible to recruit trained pastoral workers to support this transition but we are not in that position. As resources are scarce, I propose that I will make it the principal task of my ministry to work on that change. But scarce resources also suggest that we need to implement change area by area so that parishes, priests and people who are engaging in change are adequately supported.

Bishop Ger Nash


bottom of page